Comments on: Reader Feedback: Sarah Palin and Science

By: Danette McGovern

Danette McGovern — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:26:10 +0000

Sara Palin would never even be hired as a teacher in any public school in the USA. How can anyone believe she should be a heartbeat from the presidency? Since she believes that intelligent design should be taught alongside evolution as “science” it would discredit her as a teacher. What was McCain thinking? By marketing to what he perceived as a popular view (choose any woman they’re all the same-let’s get those Hillary supporters) he has cheapened the entire election.

By: Darwin Central » Blog Archive » Dowd, Damon, and teh Dumbness.

Darwin Central » Blog Archive » Dowd, Damon, and teh Dumbness. — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:00:44 +0000

[...] they erroneously assume to be their base. In addition to lending themselves to lies, they result in grave doubts from people who on the surface, should be their allies. In other words: Draft Jon Huntsman in 2012. [...]

By: John S.

John S. — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:42:12 +0000

As an Alaskan resident, I was a Palin supporter. But the more I get to know Palin, the more I think she is not educated or experienced enough to be a heart beat away from leading this country. I admire her life story. However, an admirable life story by itself should not be sole requirement to be Vice President.

Sarah Palin does not have a science or medical degree. I’m not putting her down. She is a remarkable women who has a lot of potential with wonderful leadership skills.

Without having a basic grasp in the fundamentals in science, engineering, and medicine how can Sarah Palin make decisions on global warning, funding for NASA, stem cell research, funding for science education, and other issues.

In the late 50’s and early 60’s, the Federal Government heavily funded science, engineering and education to beat the Soviets to the Moon. That resulted in a boom in science and technology that brought us new technologies that we take for granted today.

Since our politicians today have little knowledge in science, we have become a second rate country in the area of engineering, science and other R & D ventures. Most of the students attending our top rated graduate schools in science and engineering are foreign nations from India, China, and other countries.

I would like Sarah Palin to visit our Top rated graduate schools in engineering and science. Her and John McCain needs to talk to PhD’s in science and engineering on how to improve our standing in the world in research and development. Palin and McCain need to tour our top rated medical schools and visit NASA centers. If Sarah Palin doesn’t understand the basic fundamentals, how can she answer complex questions or tackle issues.

By: Neil Gussman

Neil Gussman — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:22:59 +0000

Every four years since 1980 I have read The Prince by N. Machiavelli on the eve of the presidential election. It is a great book to provide a framework for all the stuff you hear from both candidates. The most quoted maxim of Machiavelli is that a [politican's] primary goals are to take power and keep power. Everything else is secondary, because without power you can do nothing. By picking Sarah Palin, McCain shows his first concern is winning. Where science comes on that priority list, I can’t say.

By: Bart L

Bart L — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:16:59 +0000

Re: global warming and spending

McCain’s representative at the National Space Society’s International Space Development Conference (http://www.isdc2008.org) was quite adamant about the Senator wanting to do something more about global warming/cooling/climate change. He specifically mentioned more funding for Earth-observing satellites.

Re: evolution, creationism, intelligent design, etc.

Like a couple of the folks mentioned above, I consider myself a Christian. However, there’s room in my mind for an “old Earth.” Common structures (biological, skeletal) abound in Earth-based life, and they are hard to ignore, as is the fossil record. However, the precise mechanisms of evolution are still unclear–we’ve never really seen it happen–so I’m willing to leave a little mystery out there.

Or one might quote the t-shirt that says, “And God said [Maxwell's Equations], and there was light!” Never mind. I’m probably going to heck just for typing this. My problem, not yours.

By: Michael Blaine

Michael Blaine — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:14:32 +0000

The naming of Sarah Palin as a VP candidate represents a grave threat to the USA’s position within Western civilization.

Anti-science attitudes will nudge us back to the Stone Age.

That John Sidney McCain III would place such reactionary forces so close to the White House is tantamount to taking a big, steaming dump on our government and our nation.

By: Philip H.

Philip H. — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:14:26 +0000

Since I’m in John’s camp with respect to being a Christian and a scientists (not to be confused with a Christian Scientist), I Have to agree with him. McCain has a real conundrum – he accepts Climate Change as a real threat, but he isn’t likely to fund the research and technology development we need to address the issue. Instead, he’ll wait for the “market” to drive the innovation engine, and they will – in other countries like Japan, and perhaps even India and china. So sad, especially since he’s the first intelligent Republican presidential candidate in decades.