<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Big Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2008/11/the_next_big_future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2008/11/the_next_big_future/</link>
	<description>Rooting for Citizen Scientists!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:48:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 10 Questions for Ray Kurzweil &#124; Science Cheerleader</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2008/11/the_next_big_future/comment-page-1/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Questions for Ray Kurzweil &#124; Science Cheerleader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=191#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>[...] http://sciencecheerleader.com/2008/11/the_next_big_future/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://sciencecheerleader.com/2008/11/the_next_big_future/" rel="nofollow">http://sciencecheerleader.com/2008/11/the_next_big_future/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2008/11/the_next_big_future/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=191#comment-523</guid>
		<description>I am a scientist and am familiar of Kurzweil&#039;s ideas of the near-time possibility of a technological singularity.  Kurzweill is one of these guys who has traded a real depth of knowledge in a single area for a superficial knowledge on many.  He under-appreciates some very fundamental technical challenges that need to be overcome in diverse areas before some of the developments that he predicts are anywhere near realizable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a scientist and am familiar of Kurzweil&#8217;s ideas of the near-time possibility of a technological singularity.  Kurzweill is one of these guys who has traded a real depth of knowledge in a single area for a superficial knowledge on many.  He under-appreciates some very fundamental technical challenges that need to be overcome in diverse areas before some of the developments that he predicts are anywhere near realizable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2008/11/the_next_big_future/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>JT Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=191#comment-513</guid>
		<description>Hey Science Cheerleader, you&#039;re funny!  
Can scientific research reveal who else is funny?  
Help the researchers.  Rate the relative funniness of jokes at http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/how-funny-are-these-jokes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Science Cheerleader, you&#8217;re funny!<br />
Can scientific research reveal who else is funny?<br />
Help the researchers.  Rate the relative funniness of jokes at <a href="http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/how-funny-are-these-jokes/" rel="nofollow">http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/how-funny-are-these-jokes/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
