Comments on: Brain Makeover #12: Relativity http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/06/brain_makeover_12_relativity/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=brain_makeover_12_relativity Rooting for Citizen Scientists! Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:47:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Ian Nelson Linnell http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/06/brain_makeover_12_relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-3623 Ian Nelson Linnell Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:06:00 +0000 http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=634#comment-3623 agreed. besides, I would also challenge that last sentence, because, just because their supposed "Creator" is supposed to be infinite, that does not imply that just because something is infinite (or, rather, limitless) that is a part of their Creator. agreed. besides, I would also challenge that last sentence, because, just because their supposed “Creator” is supposed to be infinite, that does not imply that just because something is infinite (or, rather, limitless) that is a part of their Creator.

]]> By: Ian Nelson Linnell http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/06/brain_makeover_12_relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-3560 Ian Nelson Linnell Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:06:14 +0000 http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=634#comment-3560 agreed. besides, I would also challenge that last sentence, because, just because their supposed "Creator" is supposed to be infinite, that does not imply that just because something is infinite (or, rather, limitless) that is a part of their Creator. agreed. besides, I would also challenge that last sentence, because, just because their supposed “Creator” is supposed to be infinite, that does not imply that just because something is infinite (or, rather, limitless) that is a part of their Creator.

]]> By: victorian houses » Researchers create gravity in lab experiment http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/06/brain_makeover_12_relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-1816 victorian houses » Researchers create gravity in lab experiment Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:07:30 +0000 http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=634#comment-1816 [...] Brain Makeover #12: Relativity [...] [...] Brain Makeover #12: Relativity [...]

]]> By: Doug Ziemke http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/06/brain_makeover_12_relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-1805 Doug Ziemke Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:20:04 +0000 http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=634#comment-1805 Please note the link to the AllAboutScience.org site provided here slips in a plug for Creationism at the very end of the article. "Moreover, the very physical nature of time and space also suggest a Creator, for infinity and eternity must necessarily exist from a logical perspective. The existence of time implies eternity (as time has a beginning and an end), and the existence of space implies infinity. The very concepts of infinity and eternity infer a Creator because they find their very state of being in God, who transcends both and simply is. " I would challenge the first sentence.. that the nature of of time and space suggest a Creator. However the bigger issue here is that, as we all know, bringing in Religion to Science discussions and, likewise, bringing in Science to Religion discussions get us nowhere. Please note the link to the AllAboutScience.org site provided here slips in a plug for Creationism at the very end of the article.

“Moreover, the very physical nature of time and space also suggest a Creator, for infinity and eternity must necessarily exist from a logical perspective. The existence of time implies eternity (as time has a beginning and an end), and the existence of space implies infinity. The very concepts of infinity and eternity infer a Creator because they find their very state of being in God, who transcends both and simply is. ”

I would challenge the first sentence.. that the nature of of time and space suggest a Creator. However the bigger issue here is that, as we all know, bringing in Religion to Science discussions and, likewise, bringing in Science to Religion discussions get us nowhere.

]]> By: Doug Ziemke http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/06/brain_makeover_12_relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-4510 Doug Ziemke Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:20:00 +0000 http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=634#comment-4510 Please note the link to the AllAboutScience.org site provided here slips in a plug for Creationism at the very end of the article. "Moreover, the very physical nature of time and space also suggest a Creator, for infinity and eternity must necessarily exist from a logical perspective. The existence of time implies eternity (as time has a beginning and an end), and the existence of space implies infinity. The very concepts of infinity and eternity infer a Creator because they find their very state of being in God, who transcends both and simply is. " I would challenge the first sentence.. that the nature of of time and space suggest a Creator. However the bigger issue here is that, as we all know, bringing in Religion to Science discussions and, likewise, bringing in Science to Religion discussions get us nowhere. Please note the link to the AllAboutScience.org site provided here slips in a plug for Creationism at the very end of the article.

“Moreover, the very physical nature of time and space also suggest a Creator, for infinity and eternity must necessarily exist from a logical perspective. The existence of time implies eternity (as time has a beginning and an end), and the existence of space implies infinity. The very concepts of infinity and eternity infer a Creator because they find their very state of being in God, who transcends both and simply is. ”

I would challenge the first sentence.. that the nature of of time and space suggest a Creator. However the bigger issue here is that, as we all know, bringing in Religion to Science discussions and, likewise, bringing in Science to Religion discussions get us nowhere.

]]> By: jim http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/06/brain_makeover_12_relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-1801 jim Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:41:55 +0000 http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=634#comment-1801 this leads me to wonder...what about safe nuclear energy? this leads me to wonder…what about safe nuclear energy?

]]> By: jim http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/06/brain_makeover_12_relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-4509 jim Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:41:00 +0000 http://sciencecheerleader.com/?p=634#comment-4509 this leads me to wonder...what about safe nuclear energy? this leads me to wonder…what about safe nuclear energy?

]]>