<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is Your Brain on Pentagon Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/09/this_is_your_brain_on_pentagon_channel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/09/this_is_your_brain_on_pentagon_channel/</link>
	<description>Rooting for Citizen Scientists!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:34:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Ohab</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/09/this_is_your_brain_on_pentagon_channel/comment-page-1/#comment-2439</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ohab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/?p=918#comment-2439</guid>
		<description>Paul, thanks for your comment. I&#039;m not sure if you caught the NPR report, &quot;Is This Your Brain On God?&quot;, from a while back, but it explores the convergence of scientific research and spirituality. I can&#039;t comment on the scientific accuracy, but it might be worth a read if you&#039;re interested. 

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=110997741

Re: the polygraph, Dr. Bhatt said pretty much the same thing during our Armed with Science interview back in July.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, thanks for your comment. I&#8217;m not sure if you caught the NPR report, &#8220;Is This Your Brain On God?&#8221;, from a while back, but it explores the convergence of scientific research and spirituality. I can&#8217;t comment on the scientific accuracy, but it might be worth a read if you&#8217;re interested. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=110997741" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=110997741</a></p>
<p>Re: the polygraph, Dr. Bhatt said pretty much the same thing during our Armed with Science interview back in July.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Shin</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/09/this_is_your_brain_on_pentagon_channel/comment-page-1/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/?p=918#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>The fMRI research is fascinating and could shed valuable insight into the workings of the mind. The big-picture issue still remains though: are we defined by our bodies? Can any of these experiments really give us a greater insight into the human condition or the soul?

Lastly, the polygraph has been scientifically discredited to the point of dubious legal credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fMRI research is fascinating and could shed valuable insight into the workings of the mind. The big-picture issue still remains though: are we defined by our bodies? Can any of these experiments really give us a greater insight into the human condition or the soul?</p>
<p>Lastly, the polygraph has been scientifically discredited to the point of dubious legal credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
