<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decentralizing expert advice to inform federal science policy.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/11/decentralizing-expert-advice-to-inform-federal-science-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/11/decentralizing-expert-advice-to-inform-federal-science-policy/</link>
	<description>Rooting for Citizen Scientists!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:55:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anil Dash</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2009/11/decentralizing-expert-advice-to-inform-federal-science-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2751</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/?p=1397#comment-2751</guid>
		<description>Good news Darlene: We absolutely want *everyone* to contribute to the mission at Expert Labs, and I certainly don&#039;t think only some pre-defined list of people have the expertise to contribute to solving our country&#039;s problems. I&#039;m not an academic, and by the incredibly impressive standards of my peers at AAAS, I&#039;m hardly an expert, yet they&#039;ve welcomed my contribution with open arms, and I intend to pay it forward.

What I wanted to emphasize, in pointing out that we all have areas of expertise to contribute, is that our efforts at Expert Labs aren&#039;t going to demonstrate that fear that a lot of policy makers have, which is based on the idea that being completely open to public input is akin to allowing for mob rule. Obviously, people who are experienced on the web know that we actually have great ways to collaborate together without just highlighting the worst behaviors or least inspired ideas in a group, but other folks who are less familiar with the web&#039;s successes can be a bit (understandably!) nervous about these things.

I&#039;ll try to make this clearer in the future, but my belief is that we&#039;re all expert at &lt;em&gt;something&lt;/em&gt;, and those are the topics we can weigh in on. I don&#039;t want to build a system that just rewards the noisiest folks (who aren&#039;t always the most informed on a topic), but I certainly think we can open the doors to participation from anybody who&#039;s developed expertise on a topic, whether that&#039;s through traditional means or not.

I hope that clears things up! Let me know if there&#039;s a better way to get that message across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news Darlene: We absolutely want *everyone* to contribute to the mission at Expert Labs, and I certainly don&#8217;t think only some pre-defined list of people have the expertise to contribute to solving our country&#8217;s problems. I&#8217;m not an academic, and by the incredibly impressive standards of my peers at AAAS, I&#8217;m hardly an expert, yet they&#8217;ve welcomed my contribution with open arms, and I intend to pay it forward.</p>
<p>What I wanted to emphasize, in pointing out that we all have areas of expertise to contribute, is that our efforts at Expert Labs aren&#8217;t going to demonstrate that fear that a lot of policy makers have, which is based on the idea that being completely open to public input is akin to allowing for mob rule. Obviously, people who are experienced on the web know that we actually have great ways to collaborate together without just highlighting the worst behaviors or least inspired ideas in a group, but other folks who are less familiar with the web&#8217;s successes can be a bit (understandably!) nervous about these things.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to make this clearer in the future, but my belief is that we&#8217;re all expert at <em>something</em>, and those are the topics we can weigh in on. I don&#8217;t want to build a system that just rewards the noisiest folks (who aren&#8217;t always the most informed on a topic), but I certainly think we can open the doors to participation from anybody who&#8217;s developed expertise on a topic, whether that&#8217;s through traditional means or not.</p>
<p>I hope that clears things up! Let me know if there&#8217;s a better way to get that message across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
